Online Monitoring of Magnetometer Signals for Estimating Induced Electric Fields in Power Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Powerful solar storms emit plasma that may travel towards the earth. Interactions between the plasma and the earth magnetic field cause geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs), which in turn induce quasi-dc voltage along long conductors in power systems. The induced electric field can be calculated by magnetic field data measured by magnetometers at several stations. In this paper, a set of online processing methods are proposed to improve signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the calculated electric field signals. In the first step, magnetic field signals are denoised inside a sliding window by a wavelet transform. The sliding window width is optimized and the introduced transients are compensated. Time derivative of magnetic field signals are estimated by a continuous wavelet transform in the next step, and the size of the sliding window is minimized for optimal computational speed. Ultimately, a method is proposed to further enhance the SNR by updating the previously processed data points. The magnetic and electric field signals obtained by the online and offline processing methods are compared with each other. It is demonstrated that the online processing methods can decrease the noises to a level comparable to that obtained by the offline methods. The results of this study can be implemented to protect key elements of power systems against severe solar storms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".