Emerging Challenges and Reforms Facing the International Court of Justice in Dispute Resolution - Jurisdiction and Arbitrability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, has long been of significant relevance in the resolution of international disputes and the maintenance of world peace.Nonetheless, the application of the ICJ is not promising since its establishment, and there is considerable controversy concerning several decisions and advisory opinions made by the Court.Nevertheless, the reform of the ICJ is a process aimed at renovating or modifying its substantive and procedural rules to promote efficiency and achieve justice.This paper identifies external challenges and the internal demand for renovation as the ICJ's incentives in addressing future reforms.By invoking case studies and strategic research, this article provides reform propositions concerning expanding the scope of litigation jurisdiction and limitations on the veto power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.087 | 0.092 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.045 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.026 | 0.025 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".