MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285191605 · doi:10.15826/izv2.2022.24.2.025

Afterimage by H. Humphreys as a Photoreconstruction Novel: Genre Peculiarities

2022· article· en· W4285191605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tatiana A. Poluektova

Bibliographic record

VenueIzvestia of the Ural federal university Series 2 Humanities and Arts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Portsmouth
KeywordsCharacter (mathematics)MythologyNarrativeLiteratureArtPoeticsPlot (graphics)HistoryPoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is devoted to the study of the peculiar genre features of Afterimage (2000), a novel by the English-born Canadian writer Helen Humphreys. The author of the article introduces the definition of the concept of photographic ekphrasis, i.e. a description in the text of a photograph that is the subject of a character’s reflection or the result of a collaboration of the photographer and the model. The photographic discourse penetrates the plot-compositional, character, space-time, and narrative levels of the poetics of the novel. Starting with the analysis of the title of the novel, the author of the article concludes about the decisive role of photography in the genre structure of the novel. This makes it possible to introduce the term “photoreconstruction novel” and categorise the novel analysed as belonging to this type. This genre form implies a number of characteristic features: the presence of protophotographic ekphrasis (the existence of a real photographic prototype in culture defined by the reader on the basis of secondary cultural experience (this term is introduced for the first time)); the novel is set in a period remote from the modern times, as a rule between the mid-nineteenth and early twentieth centuries; the main character is a photographer-reconstructor of a myth / mythological image; supported by the motif of theatricalisation (“the character of being staged”). Particular attention is paid to the link of allegorical photographic works of the English Victorian photographer J. M. Cameron and photographic ekphrases in the novel by H. Humphreys. The organic synthesis of two types of art — artistic words and photographic art — forms intermediate connections in the novel, expanding the field of interpretation and implying an active role of the reader. Humphreys’ Afterimage based on the genre structure of a photographic ekphrasis fits into the context of the phototextual English-language novel of the late nineteenth — early twenty-first centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIzvestia of the Ural federal university Series 2 Humanities and ArtsSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207