Shape Representation and Modeling of Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots Using Euler Arc Splines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the compliance of tendon-driven continuum robots, carrying a load or experiencing a tip force result in variations in backbone curvature. While the spatial robot configuration theoretically needs an infinite number of parameters for exact description, it can be well approximated using Euler Arc Splines which use only six of them. In this letter, we first show the accuracy of this representation by fitting the Euler Arc splines directly to experimentally measured robot shapes. Additionally, we propose a 3D static model that can account for gravity, friction and tip forces. We demonstrate the utility of using efficient parameterization by analyzing the computation time of the proposed model and then, using it to propose a hybrid model that combines physics-based model with observed data. The average tip error for the Euler arc spline representation is$0.43$% and the proposed static model is$3.25$% w.r.t. robot length. The average computation time is$0.56 \,\mathrm{ms}$for nonplanar deformations for a robot with ten disks. The hybrid model reduces the maximum error predicted by the static model from$8.6$% to$5.1$% w.r.t. robot length, while using 30 observations for training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".