Le régime d’application provisoire de l’AECG entre le Canada et l’Union Européenne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En attendant son entrée en vigueur intégrale, l’Accord économique et commercial global entre le Canada et l’Union européenne (AECG/CETA) est d’application provisoire depuis le 21 septembre 2017, sans le système de règlement des différends entre investisseurs et États qu’il comporte. Cette partie de l’accord relève du domaine de compétence partagée entre l’Union et ses nombreux États membres, à la différence de la « politique commerciale commune » qui est de compétence exclusive de l’Union. Elle a été exclue du champ de l’application provisoire afin de déclencher celle-ci rapidement. Le consensus des deux Parties sur cette délimitation a permis de mettre en application la majeure partie de l’accord selon des procédures très différentes au Canada et au sein de l’Union européenne. L’AECG admet cependant plusieurs causes de fin prématurée de son application provisoire, parmi lesquelles l’échec définitif du processus d’approbation parlementaire et de ratification de n’importe quel État membre de l’Union.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".