MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285197527 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2022.3183831

Bioptim, a Python Framework for Musculoskeletal Optimal Control in Biomechanics

2022· article· en· W4285197527 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin Michaud, François Bailly, Eve Charbonneau, Amedeo Ceglia, Léa Sanchez, Mickaël Begon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsPython (programming language)Computer scienceBiomechanicsNonlinear systemGraphical user interfaceSoftwareMotion captureSimulationArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageMotion (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Musculoskeletal simulations are useful in biomechanics to investigate the causes of movement disorders, estimate nonmeasurable physiological quantities, or study the optimality of human movement. We introduce Bioptim, an easy-to-use Python framework for biomechanical optimal control based on both direct multiple shooting and direct collocation, handling musculoskeletal models. Relying on algorithmic differentiation, Bioptim is fast and it interfaces several nonlinear solvers. The software is both computationally efficient (C++ core) and easily customizable, thanks to its Python interface. It allows to quickly define a variety of biomechanical problems, such as motion tracking/prediction, muscle-driven simulations, parameters optimization, multiphase problems, etc. It is also intended for real-time applications, such as moving horizon estimation and model predictive control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207