Performance Analysis of Mobile Cloud Computing With Bursty Demand: A Tandem Queue Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resource-constrained end devices can offload computation to backend clouds. The stochastic wireless channel that an end device is connected to can introduce bursty computation demand to the cloud. Specifically, under good channel conditions, a device can transmit more data to the cloud, which consequently yields higher instantaneous computation demand. Conversely, poor channel conditions can result in lower instantaneous demand. The performance indicator for such a mobile cloud computing system is the average of the response time, which is the time span from the arrival of the computation demand at the backend cloud instance to the completion of its execution. The question we target in this paper is how resources should be provisioned for the backend cloud instance to address this bursty computation demand and guarantee a desired quality-of-service (QoS), namely, a user-specified average response time. To answer this question, we model the mobile cloud computing system as two tandem queues. We analyze this queueing network using the fluid flow analysis framework, and derive the analytical relationship between the required resource capacity at the backend cloud instance and the desired QoS, given the workload generation process at the end device and the wireless channel conditions. Having obtained the required resource capacity for a desired QoS, we then determine whether it is economical to provision this resource capacity by subscribing to the traditional static instance or the recently introduced burstable instance offered by public cloud providers. Finally, trace-driven simulations validate our theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".