MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285200274 · doi:10.1590/1809-58442022110pt

Uma metodologia reflexiva para desocidentalizar o subcampo da Comunicação Organizacional LatinoAmericana

2022· article· pt· W4285200274 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntercom Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo O presente artigo visa desenvolver uma metodologia reflexiva para investigar a produção de conhecimento do subcampo de pesquisa de Comunicação Organizacional, levando em conta as realidades contextuais, institucionais e culturais da região latino-americana. Para isso, respondendo aos recentes chamados de desocidentalização da Comunicação, adotamos neste artigo uma abordagem de trabalho “de baixo para cima”, que favorece as realidades vivenciadas pelos pesquisadores latino-americanos e estudiosos em Comunicação Organizacional. A metodologia proposta proporciona um modelo investigativo que possa servir como um exemplo para desocidentalizar a produção de conhecimento em campos correlacionados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0100.009
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it