Task Offloading for Cloud-Assisted Fog Computing With Dynamic Service Caching in Enterprise Management Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In enterprise management systems (EMS), augmented Intelligence of Things (AIoT) devices generate delay-sensitive and energy-intensive tasks for learning analytics, articulate clarifications, and immersive experiences. To guarantee effective task processing, in this work, we present a cloud-assisted fog computing framework with task offloading and service caching. In the framework, tasks make offloading decisions to determine local processing, fog processing, and cloud processing with the goal of minimal task delay and energy consumption, conditioned on dynamic service caching. To this end, we first propose a distributed task offloading algorithm based on noncooperative game theory. Then, we adopt the 0–1 knapsack method to realize dynamic service caching. At last, we adjust the offloading decisions for the tasks offloaded to the fog server but without caching service support. In addition, we conduct extensive experiments and the results validate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it