MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285205889 · doi:10.1177/11795441221097361

The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Quality of Life Among Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis Living in Egypt

2022· article· en· W4285205889 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Samaan, Sara Taha

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Medicine Insights Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDyslipidemiaWOMACOsteoarthritisMetabolic syndromeObesityPhysical therapyInternal medicineBody mass indexQuality of life (healthcare)Diabetes mellitusCross-sectional studyEndocrinologyPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Several studies have linked metabolic syndrome (MetS) to osteoarthritis (OA), but they have not looked into how MetS can affect the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of OA individuals. Objectives: We aimed to assess the association of MetS and its components, including obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia, with HRQOL among Egyptians with knee OA. Methods: This cross-sectional study comprised 116 adult Egyptian participants with knee OA. They were divided into 2 groups based on whether or not they had the MetS. All participants were subjected to a thorough medical history taking and a detailed medical examination. The Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) scale evaluated OA in all individuals using anteroposterior knee radiographs. The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used to assess participants’ HRQOL; their higher scores indicate more disability. Spearman rank and Pearson’s correlation analyses were used to assess the association between variables. Results: Diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity were significantly associated with the OA + MetS group with a prevalence of 77.6%, 82.8%, 77.6%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the K/L scale, 70.7% of the OA + MetS group had grade IV knee affection. The HAQ-DI and WOMAC scores were significantly ( P < .001) higher among the OA + MetS individuals compared with the OA individuals. Interleukin (IL)-6 serum levels were also significantly higher in the OA + MetS group ( P = .036) and increased significantly with the more serious radiological damage and functional disability. We found significant positive correlations between HAQ-DI and WOMAC with waist circumference ( P = .004, .001), as well as triglycerides ( P = .006, .008), cholesterol ( P = .041, .048), fasting blood sugar ( P < .001, < .001) and significant negative correlations with high-density lipoprotein levels ( P = .628, .002). Conclusions: Individuals with knee OA with MetS showed more significant radiological damage, severe functional disability, and poor HRQOL. They also had higher levels of IL-6, which correlated significantly with the degree of disability, promoting it as a significant therapeutic target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Medicine Insights Arthritis and Musculoskeletal DisordersSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207