MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285206787 · doi:10.1039/d2cp01458k

Infrared spectroscopic monitoring of solid-state processes

2022· review· en· W4285206787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie ActionsHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsSolid-stateInfraredState (computer science)NanotechnologyMaterials scienceEngineering physicsComputer sciencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared spectroscopy, ubiquitous in contemporary chemical laboratories, is frequently underutilised for just the basic characterisation of products. However, its unique ability to provide rich molecular-level information, its simplicity and flexibility for various applications, and its ability to be combined with a variety of techniques, make it one of the most useful techniques for a deep understanding of the microscopic background of chemical and physical phenomena, especially those of relevance for materials applications. This tutorial review puts a spotlight on IR spectroscopic investigations in materials science by providing a critical insight into the state of the art, covering both fundamental aspects and illustrative examples of its utilisation, as well as current challenges and perspectives focusing on physical and chemical transformations in the solid state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it