PVD-FL: A Privacy-Preserving and Verifiable Decentralized Federated Learning Framework
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past years, the increasingly severe data island problem has spawned an emerging distributed deep learning framework—federated learning, in which the global model can be constructed over multiple participants without directly sharing their raw data. Despite its promising prospect, there are still many security challenges in federated learning, such as privacy preservation and integrity verification. Furthermore, federated learning is usually performed with the assistance of a center, which is prone to cause trust worries and communicational bottlenecks. To tackle these challenges, in this paper, we propose a privacy-preserving and verifiable decentralized federated learning framework, named PVD-FL, which can achieve secure deep learning model training under a decentralized architecture. Specifically, we first design an efficient and verifiable cipher-based matrix multiplication (EVCM) algorithm to execute the most basic calculation in deep learning. Then, by employing EVCM, we design a suite of decentralized algorithms to construct the PVD-FL framework, which ensures the confidentiality of both global model and local update and the verification of every training step. Detailed security analysis shows that PVD-FL can well protect privacy against various inference attacks and guarantee training integrity. In addition, the extensive experiments on real-world datasets also demonstrate that PVD-FL can achieve lossless accuracy and practical performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it