3D Printed Linearly Polarized X-Band Conical Horn Antenna and Lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A low-cost method to 3D print and metalize circular waveguide components is demonstrated using polylactic acid (PLA) and aluminum adhesive backed tape. A gradient index (GRIN) lens, an externally metalized thin-walled conical horn, and a WR90 rectangular to linearly polarized circular waveguide transition are simulated, fabricated, and measured. The horn and lens were both monolithic prints that were externally metallized to simplify the metallization process. Both the horn and lens have a measured operational bandwidth of 8.2 GHz to 12.4 GHz with an input reflection less than -15 dB and peak gain of 18.7 dBi at mid-band. The walls of the thin-wall horn are printed at a thickness such that the dielectric layer does not impact the performance of the horn while being robust enough to support external metallization. The lensed horn functioned as the support for the aluminum foil while also improving the radiation pattern by improving the E SLL by up to 15 dB compared to the thin-walled horn antenna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".