MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285243631 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2022.3173671

Toward the Coexistence of Cognitive Networks for Vehicular Communications on TVWS for IEEE Std. 802.22

2022· article· en· W4285243631 on OpenAlexaff
Adriana Arteaga, Sandra Céspedes, César A. Azurdia-Meza

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite spacesComputer networkComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Channel allocation schemesInterference (communication)Cognitive radioWireless networkWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IEEE 802.22 is a standard for wireless regional area networks to opportunistically operate in TV bands; however, sharing TV White Space (TVWS) spectrum creates a problem of coexistence because no mechanism is defined for coordinating channel usage among secondary networks. We propose a White Space Resource Sharing mechanism (WSRS) for fixed secondary and mobile IEEE 802.22 networks to improve network coexistence and spectrum efficiency. Based on power control and channel allocation, our mechanism allows the TVWS system to serve vehicular networks in scenarios where there are active secondary fixed networks and no more TVWS channels available for opportunistic usage. Unlike state-of-the-art mechanisms for coexistence in TVWS spectrum, our mechanism allocates resources to vehicles even when the density of fixed nodes and the transmission power of the fixed network cause high interference to the vehicular network. Our results show the offered channel capacity increases up to 50% using the proposed WSRS mechanism compared to the recent IEEE 802.22 standard that does not have a defined TVWS channel sharing mechanism. Furthermore, our WSRS mechanism implements a strategy to protect the fixed secondary network from interference caused by vehicular transmissions while promoting fair usage for both secondary networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207