An Analysis of the Error Rate Performance for Uplink Asynchronous Signal Detection in Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate multiuser detection under uplink asynchronous scenario, where the triangular successive interference cancellation (T-SIC) detection scheme is exploited. As the existing analysis was conducted under some ideal assumptions for simplicity, the asynchronous scenario is analyzed under rigorous assumptions in this paper so that important insights are revealed for practical systems. Specifically, the average symbol error rate (SER) formulas are derived for a two-user system with arbitrary$M$-ary quadrature amplitude modulation ($M$-QAM) over Rayleigh fading channels. These solutions are shown to have higher accuracies compared to the existing solutions. Furthermore, a novel iterative detection algorithm is proposed, i.e., the parallel T-SIC method, which is more efficient and effective compared to the iterative T-SIC method. Insightful discussion is conducted in terms of the potentials of the concerned iterative detection method. Simulation results show that the most significant improvement of the iterative detection reflects on the SER for the strongest user, and the reduction is always within 50% of the SER compared to the primary detection. The gains obtained by the iterative detection is negligible for higher order$M$-QAM cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".