Comment des adolescents qui consomment des substances psychoactives pensent influencer leurs parents ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude examine l’influence des adolescents sur leurs parents, dans les contextes socioculturels d’Afrique Subsaharienne (Togo) et d’Europe Occidentale (Belgique). À travers une démarche qualitative inductive, les données d’entretiens semi-directifs avec des adolescents qui consomment des substances psychoactives ont fait l’objet d’une analyse phénoménologique interprétative. Les résultats montrent une bidirectionnalité de cette influence et les thèmes qui émergent renvoient à la préoccupation sur les résultats scolaires, sur la consommation de substances, et sur les besoins matériels et affectifs des adolescents. L’étude a montré que les significations culturelles associées à la relation parent-adolescent et à la consommation de substances impriment l'agentivité de l’adolescent. Elle a permis de mieux comprendre l’adolescent comme un partenaire actif du processus de construction de son identité, au même titre que les parents, et permet de modifier bien d’idées reçues à propos des adolescents qui consomment des substances psychoactives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".