MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285248263 · doi:10.1017/fms.2022.13

The effective model structure and -groupoid objects

2022· article· en· W4285248263 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicola Gambino, Simon Henry, Christian Sattler, Karol Szumiło

Bibliographic record

VenueForum of Mathematics Sigma · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Air ForceVetenskapsrådetAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilCarnegie Mellon University
KeywordsModel categoryMathematicsCoproductDescent (aeronautics)Cartesian closed categoryTopos theoryCountable setPure mathematicsConcrete categoryAnalogyCartesian coordinate systemDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsHomotopy categoryFunctorHomotopyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For a category $\mathcal {E}$ with finite limits and well-behaved countable coproducts, we construct a model structure, called the effective model structure, on the category of simplicial objects in $\mathcal {E}$ , generalising the Kan–Quillen model structure on simplicial sets. We then prove that the effective model structure is left and right proper and satisfies descent in the sense of Rezk. As a consequence, we obtain that the associated $\infty $ -category has finite limits, colimits satisfying descent, and is locally Cartesian closed when $\mathcal {E}$ is but is not a higher topos in general. We also characterise the $\infty $ -category presented by the effective model structure, showing that it is the full sub-category of presheaves on $\mathcal {E}$ spanned by Kan complexes in $\mathcal {E}$ , a result that suggests a close analogy with the theory of exact completions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum of Mathematics SigmaSame topicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207