Learning-Based Robust Bipartite Consensus Control for a Class of Multiagent Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article studies the robust bipartite consensus problems for heterogeneous nonlinear nonaffine discrete-time multiagent systems (MASs) with fixed and switching topologies against data dropout and unknown disturbances. The controlled system’s virtual linear data model is first developed by employing the pseudopartial derivative technique, and a distributed combined measurement error function is established utilizing a signed graph theory. Then, an input gain compensation scheme is formulated to mitigate the effects of data dropout in both feedback and forward channels. Moreover, a data-driven learning-based robust bipartite consensus control (LRBCC) scheme based on a radial basis function neural network observer is proposed to estimate the unknown disturbance, using the online input/output data without requiring any information on the mathematical dynamics. The stability analysis of the proposed LRBCC approach is given. Finally, simulation and hardware testing results further demonstrate the designed method’s correctness and effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it