MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285263378 · doi:10.37520/nl.2020.009

Praha-Vinoř. Opevněné centrum prvních Přemyslovců ve světle mincovních nálezů

2022· article· en· W4285263378 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ivo Štefan, Jiří Lukas, Kamil Smíšek, Jan Hasil

Bibliographic record

VenueNumismatické listy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)Quarter (Canadian coin)Ancient historyArchaeologyGeographyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study presents single coin finds obtained by the systematic metal detector survey from the area of the settlement complex in Prague-Vinoř. Here, a stronghold of the first Přemyslids with an associated settlement were established at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. In the 11th and 12th centuries, a large (probably church) burial ground and a high medieval manorial seat existed in this area. To date, a total of 58 single coin finds have been recorded from all the above-mentioned locations, with 16 coins dating from the 10th to early 13th centuries. The oldest is a unique coin of the bishop of Augsburg, St. Ulrich of Augsburg, minted in the early days of his coinage (perhaps even before the conventional year 955), the rest are domestic deniers. 17 coins belong to the years 1300–1526, 9 coins were struck before the last quarter of the 16th century. The remaining 13 individual coins were minted after the year 1648. The single coin finds present irreplaceable but rapidly disappearing evidence of the changing socio-economic functions of the site, and the development of the cultural landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNumismatické listySame topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207