MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285275504 · doi:10.19109/ieb.v1i1.12037

POTENSI DIGITAL EKONOMI BAGI PERKEMBANGAN SEKTOR PARIWISATA DI INDONESIA

2022· article· id· W4285275504 on OpenAlexaff
Barianto Nurasri Sudarmawan, Titis Miranti

Bibliographic record

VenueIEB Journal of Islamic Economics and Business · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perkembangan ekonomi digital pada Indonesia sudah mengalami kemajuan yang sangat pesat salah satunya pada bidang pariwisata. Kemajuan ekonomi digital dibidang pariwisata bisa menarik wisata nusantara (winus) juga manca negara berkunjung ketempat wisata Indonesia. Dampak menurut kemajuan ekonomi digital mengangkat poly bisnis mini & menengah buat memasuki usaha dunia. Pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia yang relatif tinggi layanan kepariwisataan Indonesia masih sedikit layanan digital yang dikembangkan. Dari analisa perkembangan layanan digital dibidang pariwisata memakai method forecasting menurut data yg diambil bisa memprediksi 10 tahun ditahun 2028 pengeluaran 465,1 Triliun rupiah & bepergian 425,75 juta kali bepergian bila dibandingkan menurut tahun 2018 dalam pengeluaran 291,09 Trilium rupiah & bepergian hanya 303,4 juta kali bepergian, menurut analisa yg didapat mempunyai peluang bagi teknopreneur buat menciptakan star up dibidang pariwisata yg menjembatani atara pariwiswata & wisatawan nusantara tentu menguntungkan bagi pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia menggunakan memakai digital ekonomi pada era industri ekonomi digital ini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEB Journal of Islamic Economics and BusinessSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207