MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285277777 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2022.3173686

Design and Implementation of an On-Demand Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE)

2022· article· en· W4285277777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHuawei TechnologiesCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMaximum likelihood sequence estimationMaximum likelihoodBit error rateComputer scienceWirelineEqualizerSequence (biology)Power (physics)Electronic engineeringEstimation theoryEngineeringAlgorithmTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematicsWirelessDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel design for Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) used in ultra-high-speed wireline communication. We take advantage of the propagated errors caused by Decision-Feedback Equalizer (DFE) to activate and guide the MLSE, thereby reducing its complexity. The design is customized for a 4-PAM, 1 + D signaling system, and synthesized in 16nm FinFET TSMC Technology. For comparison purposes, a conventional MLSE is also synthesized in the same technology. The synthesis report confirms that the proposed design consumes 1/10 of the power and occupies 1/15 of the area required by the conventional MLSE while having a comparable bit error rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it