MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285277777 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2022.3173686

Design and Implementation of an On-Demand Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE)

2022· article· en· W4285277777 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Emami Meybodi, Hector Gomez, Yu‐Chun Lu, Hossein Shakiba, Ali Sheikholeslami

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHuawei TechnologiesCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMaximum likelihood sequence estimationMaximum likelihoodBit error rateComputer scienceWirelineEqualizerSequence (biology)Power (physics)Electronic engineeringEstimation theoryEngineeringAlgorithmTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematicsWirelessDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel design for Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) used in ultra-high-speed wireline communication. We take advantage of the propagated errors caused by Decision-Feedback Equalizer (DFE) to activate and guide the MLSE, thereby reducing its complexity. The design is customized for a 4-PAM, 1 + D signaling system, and synthesized in 16nm FinFET TSMC Technology. For comparison purposes, a conventional MLSE is also synthesized in the same technology. The synthesis report confirms that the proposed design consumes 1/10 of the power and occupies 1/15 of the area required by the conventional MLSE while having a comparable bit error rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and SystemsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207