Seismic Detailing of Single Span Bridges to AASHTO Standards for the State of Nevada, USA.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of seismic detailing to the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) Structures Manual and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Standards for single span bridges located in the state of Nevada, US, with reference to Project Neon and the I15-CC215 Interchange Project. In general, detailed seismic analysis is not required for single-span bridges regardless of the seismic zone. However, the connections between the bridge superstructure and the substructure shall be designed for the minimum force requirements as recommended by AASHTO. Also, the minimum support length requirements in accordance with AASHTO shall be satisfied at each substructure. Concrete shear keys or cheek walls are, therefore, provided on the abutments to resist the lateral seismic forces, whereas dowel bars are provided to resist longitudinal seismic forces at pinned abutments. The substructure elements are detailed with transverse confinement reinforcement at plastic hinge locations as recommended by NDOT and AASHTO.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it