MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285284605 · doi:10.1109/tia.2022.3174825

Coordinated Control Strategy for Hybrid off-Grid System Based on Variable Speed Diesel Generator

2022· article· en· W4285284605 on OpenAlexaff
Miloud Rezkallah, F. Dubuisson, Sanjeev Singh, Bhim Singh, Ambrish Chandra, Hussein Ibrahim, Mazen Ghandour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Maximum power point trackingVector controlPhotovoltaic systemConvertersStatorDiesel generatorMaximum power principleComputer scienceMATLABElectronic speed controlEngineeringVoltageControl engineeringDiesel fuelAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringInduction motorInverterControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the control of hybridoff-grid configuration based on a variable-speed diesel generator and solar photovoltaic array, is implemented. To ensure a stable operation with the ac voltages and system frequency regulation, back-to-back connected converters are controlled using vector-based control, and stator flux-oriented frame-based control. To adjust the speed of diesel engine according to specific fuel consumption, an effective control strategy is developed. In addition, to compensate for the slow dynamics of variable speed operation and to balance the power in the system the dc-link voltage and battery current are controlled using a double-loop control strategy. Furthermore, the dynamic model of the dc–dc boost converter is integrated with the perturbation and observation method for obtaining smooth and efficient maximum power point tracking (MPPT). To prevent overshoots during the sudden transition, all proportional-integral controllers are reinforced with a back-calculation antiwindup scheme. The performance is obtained using MATLAB/Simulink and validated on real-time hardware to demonstrate the effectiveness of coordinated control under variations of loading and weather conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207