MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285289872 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2022117

Stability and dynamics of spike-type solutions to delayed Gierer-Meinhardt equations

2022· article· en· W4285289872 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy Khalil, David Iron, Théodore Kolokolnikov

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHopf bifurcationOrdinary differential equationMathematicsDifferential equationPosition (finance)BifurcationActivator (genetics)Mathematical analysisPhysicsChemistryNonlinear systemQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a specific set of parameters, we analyze the stability of a one-spike equilibrium solution to the one-dimensional Gierer-Meinhardt reaction-diffusion model with delay in the components of the reaction-kinetics terms. Assuming slow activator diffusivity, we consider instabilities due to Hopf bifurcation in both the spike position and the spike profile for increasing values of the time-delay parameter \begin{document}$ T $\end{document} . Using method of matched asymptotic expansions it is shown that the model can be reduced to a system of ordinary differential equations representing the position of the slowly evolving spike solution. The reduced evolution equations for the one-spike solution undergoes a Hopf bifurcation in the spike position in two cases: when the negative feedback of the activator equation is delayed, and when delay is in both the negative feedback of the activator equation and the non-linear production term of the inhibitor equation. Instabilities in the spike profile are also considered, and it is shown that the spike solution is unstable as \begin{document}$ T $\end{document} is increased beyond a critical Hopf bifurcation value \begin{document}$ T_H $\end{document} , and this occurs for the same cases as in the spike position analysis. In all cases, the instability in the profile is triggered before the positional instability. If however the degradation of activator is delayed, we find stable positional oscillations can occur in this system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - BSame topicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationFrench-language works237,207