A Multi-Source DC/AC Converter for Integrated Hybrid Energy Storage Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hybrid energy storage systems are developed in various applications to integrate high-energy battery packs and high-power ultracapacitor banks. Multi-source inverters are used for the active control of energy sources in hybrid energy storage systems. Due to the magnetic-less topology of the multi-source inverters, the weight, volume, and power losses of the hybrid energy storage systems are reduced, while keeping similar performance. In this paper, a multi-source inverter is developed for the integration and active control of a high voltage DC source and a low voltage DC source, such as battery packs and ultracapacitor banks in energy storage system applications. The topology of the proposed multi-source inverter has a lower number of switching devices compared with the previously presented counterparts. Moreover, the number of conducting switches is reduced, which results in reduced power losses and improved efficiency. A closed-loop current controller is utilized to validate the proper operation of the proposed multi-source inverter topology. A proper space vector modulation technique is implemented to generate appropriate switching pulses during all operating modes. The performance of the proposed multi-source inverter is verified through simulations on PSIM software and experiments on a laboratory prototype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".