MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285294500 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2022.3153311

Optical Energy Policy for Electricity Tariff: An Optimization Approach Over Price Integration

2022· article· en· W4285294500 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aleem Ahmed Qader, Jingwei Zhang, Muhammad Suhail Shaikh, Lijuan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTariffParticle swarm optimizationElectricityEconomicsGenetic algorithmIndustrial organizationBusinessMicroeconomicsEconometricsEnvironmental economicsMathematical optimizationInternational economicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of increasing power demand and the power industry's deregulation, it has become essential to transfer reliable and cost-effective electricity to end-consumer. Different studies have been conferring about the electricity crises worldwide, specifically in underdeveloped countries, such as Pakistan. Particularly, the consumer tariff policies concerning distribution companies (DISCOS) arise as the most crucial factors in tariff rates (peak and off-peak hours). In this research work, we have analyzed price data of peak hours using the gray wolf optimization (GWO) in comparison with particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) techniques, which shows the net outcome of the proposed procedure for the sequence to see the productive pricing efficiency of DISCOS. In addition, tariffs have been formulated by monthly oil adjustments that are explained with 11 different cases for different DISCO. The best lower obtained values of 9.0031 and 9.1450 show that the proposed technique is superior to other optimization algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207