MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285299882 · doi:10.5376/ijmeb.2022.12.0004

Genetic Diversity Analysis of <i>Roegneria kamoji</i> Population from Sichuan and Chongqing Based on ISAP Molecular Markers

2022· article· en· W4285299882 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Meng Wang, Dan Luo, Limei Yi, Zongchao Liao, Yanning Su, Jiaqi Xia, Xinquan Zhang, Gang Nie

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Evolution and Biodiversity · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermplasmGenetic diversityBiologyGenetic resourcesChinaPopulationForageBotanyBiotechnologyGeographyDemographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are abundant forage resources in southwest China, among which the wild Roegneria kamoji  Ohwi are widely distributed, especially in Sichuan and Chongqing province. Aim to figure out the genetic structure of wild R. kamoji  Ohwi in these places, providing the theoretical basis for germplasm resources collection, utilization and breeding, also exploring the genetic diversity of wild R. kamoji  Ohwi. In this experiment, the genetic diversity of 80 wild R. kamoji Ohwi from Sichuan and Chongqing were analyzed by the new molecular maker ISAP. Results showed that a total of 102 distinct and recognizable bands were amplified from 20 pairs of primers, with 97 polymorphic bands accounting for 93.14%. The PIC  average value of each ISAP site was 0.255. The results of cluster analysis showed that the germplasm resources of 80 wild R. kamoji  Ohwi were divided into 3 groups when GS was 0.815, and the clustering among the materials showed a certain correlation with geographical sources. This study might contribute to provide a theoretical basis and materials for the genetic breeding of wheat family crops in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular Evolution and BiodiversitySame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207