MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285304915 · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3183275

Induced Current Reduction in Position-Sensorless SRM Drives Using Pulse Injection

2022· article· en· W4285304915 on OpenAlexafffund
Dianxun Xiao, Jin Ye, Gaoliang Fang, Zekun Xia, Haomin Li, Xueqing Wang, Babak Nahid‐Mobarakeh, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Switched reluctance motorAmplitudeRotor (electric)Pulse (music)IdlePosition (finance)TorquePulse-width modulationVoltagePhase (matter)Reduction (mathematics)Machine controlComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsControl engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a new pulse injection scheme for low-speed position-sensorless switched reluctance motor (SRM) drives with the reduced induced current. Conventional injection methods utilize a constant injection amplitude for position estimation; however, the induced current in idle phases nonlinearly varies with the rotor position and has significant magnitude. It results in large negative torque and degrades the control performance. To mitigate this problem, an injection amplitude regulator based on terminal sliding-mode control is put forward. The amplitude of pulse voltages is adjusted online through a nonlinear control law, and the induced current can be maintained at a minimal level over the whole idle-phase period. Moreover, the adverse impacts of motor parameter uncertainties are eliminated. As a result, the proposed scheme does not require SRM's magnetic characteristics and is easy to implement. The effectiveness was experimentally validated on a three-phase 12/8 SRM setup with comparisons of the conventional method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207