MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285305113 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2022.3182295

Encrypted Cloud-Based Set-Theoretic Model Predictive Control

2022· article· en· W4285305113 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir Mohammad Naseri, Walter Lúcia, Amr Youssef

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCloud computingEncryptionComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)Model predictive controlComputer securityControl (management)Artificial intelligenceOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose an encrypted set-theoretic model predictive control (ST-MPC) strategy for cloud-based networked control systems. In particular, we consider a scenario where the plant is subject to state and input constraints, and a curious but honest cloud provider is available to implement the control logic remotely. We address the inherent privacy issue by jointly using an additive homomorphic cryptosystem and a modified version of the ST-MPC algorithm, which is tailored to run on encrypted data. We show that, by leveraging a family of zonotopic inner approximations of robust one-step controllable sets and a half-space projection algorithm, we can design the unavoidable computational load on the smart actuator’s side to be real-time affordable by the available hardware compared to other existing solutions. A simulation experiment, considering a two-tank water system, is presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Control Systems LettersSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207