Trois publicistes catholiques face à Vatican II : Marcel Clément, Jean Madiran et Michel de Saint Pierre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution s’attache à l’itinéraire croisé d’un trio de publicistes catholiques face à Vatican II : Marcel Clément (1921-2005), universitaire et journaliste passé par le Québec, Jean Madiran (1920-2013), venu de l’Action française et fondateur d’Itinéraires, et l’écrivain Michel de Saint Pierre (1916-1987), issu de Témoignage chrétien et l’auteur de best sellers antiprogressistes comme Les nouveaux prêtres. Une première partie met en scène leurs parcours politiques et religieux respectifs jusqu’au concile en insistant sur leur singularité comme sur leurs relations. La seconde analyse leurs positions respectives et critiques sur à Vatican II pour en souligner les convergences mais aussi les divergences. Ainsi, Marcel Clément et L’Homme Nouveau sont sur une ligne bien différente de celle prônée par Madiran qui, relaie alors les thèses de Michel de Saint Pierre, lequel reste cependant en contact avec Marcel Clément.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".