EXPORT OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS FROM THE STATES OF THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH-EASTERN ASIAN COUNTRIES (ASEAN)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. ASEAN currently forms a solid economic bloc with a combined GDP of US $ 3 trillion, a relatively high share of agriculture in GDP (11.3% in 2010-2020) and an expanding agri-food market based on changing conditions. global and regional trade patterns. Purpose. It consists in analyzing and identifying the problems of agri-food exports of the states that are members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Materials and methods. The research is based on the Declaration on the Establishment of ASEAN (Signed in Bangkok on August 08, 1967), statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ASEAN, and the World Trade Center. In this work, dialectical, systemic, logical research methods were used. Results. As a result of the analysis carried out in the article on agri-food exports by product, it was revealed that animal, vegetable fats and oils are the most important agricultural products of the ASEAN countries, providing a quarter of regional and more than a third of world exports. Conclusion. The agro-export policy of the ASEAN countries is largely fragmented. This is mainly due to the internal differences between the states that make up this bloc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it