Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the knowledge possessed by a Teupa teacher to share information about what and how to make Kujang which is widely known as a typical weapon from West Java. The Teupa teacher who was an informant in this study was Wahyu Affandi Suradinata from Bogor, better known as Abah Wahyu. Through a qualitative method with a descriptive approach it is hoped that it can convey straightforwardly about the profession of a Teupa Kujang Teacher. In-depth interviews were conducted in November 2014 and then supplemented with other supporting references. The results of the study show that the dedication of Abah Wahyu for 26 years made Kujang qualified as a Teupa Teacher so that he could become an example and worthy of being emulated by the next generation, then it is hoped that there will be a successor so that the cultural wealth especially related to Kujang does not become extinct. Through this study, we are really hope to capture the oral history of a Teupa Kujang teacher that is useful for the general public and cultural enthusiasts in particular so the preservation of the existence of Kujang can be maintained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".