MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative study of gravimetric and well data in Khidirli-Bendovan structures

2021· article· en· W4285320539 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A.S. Hasanov, А. I. Khuduzade

Bibliographic record

VenueAzerbaijan Oil Industry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingGravimetric analysisPetroleum engineeringGeologyFossil fuelWell drillingMining engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery of new oil and gas deposits depends on the right drilling direction, which, in its turn, is associated with the results of geophysical surveys and their appropriate estimation. In this view, a comparative analysis of the results for the wells drilled in Khidirli-Bendovan structures with up-to-date gravimetric data (performed via high accurate “Scintrex-CG-5 Autograv” device of Canada) has been carried out and can play a significant role in the selection of appropriate location of the wells to be drilled in the future with the purpose of discovery onshore oil and gas deposits in Azerbaijan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAzerbaijan Oil IndustrySame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207