MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285339068 · doi:10.2196/34594

Geospatial Heterogeneity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Searches in the United States: Infodemiology Study of Google Search Data

2022· article· en· W4285339068 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vishnutheertha Kulkarni, Ginette A. Okoye, Luis A. Garza, Shannon Wongvibulsin

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Dermatology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHidradenitis suppurativaGeospatial analysisGeographyData scienceWorld Wide WebComputer scienceCartographyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating skin disease, clear epidemiology of HS is incomplete due to difficulties in data collection Infodemiology, the utilization of web-based data such as Google Trends for public health purposes, offers a potential solution With the use of online searches for health information, Google Trends offers a rich data source to address the challenges of population-level HS research Given that HS is a disorder of disparities [4], we hypothesize that there would be nonuniform HS search interest across the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR DermatologySame topicHidradenitis Suppurativa and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207