MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detecting DDoS Attacks Using a New Polyscale Convolutional Neural Network for Policy Gradient Based DRL

2021· article· en· W4285340479 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Ghanbari, Witold Kinsner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDenial-of-service attackComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkIntrusion detection systemArtificial intelligenceReinforcement learningArchitectureThe InternetArtificial neural networkDeep learningMachine learningData miningComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new architecture of a policy gradient based deep reinforcement learning (PGDRL) for detecting Internet traffic data (ITD) with distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks (DDoS ITD) as unlabelled data. In this application, the main procedure in designing an intrusion detection system agent (IDSA) is policy approximation. Furthermore, a polyscale convolutional neural network (PCNN) is presented as a novel structure regarding the policy approximation. The IDSA aims to maximize its expected long-term rewards. Finally, the IDSA classification efficiency is assessed to find the detection rate of the proposed architecture. The PGDRL method detects the DDoS attack with almost 93% accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207