MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive Cycle-consistent Adversarial Network for Malaria Blood Cell Image Synthetization

2021· article· en· W4285347669 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaohui Liang, Jimmy Xiangji Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminatorComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Convolutional neural networkGenerator (circuit theory)MalariaFeature (linguistics)AlgorithmBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malaria is a tropical infectious disease that causes massive global deaths. The convolution neural network (CNN) models can theoretically classify the malaria infected blood cells from normal cells, but they are vulnerable to network attacks even with simple uniform noise. A typical drawback of CNN is that the algorithm cannot properly capture the meaningful patterns with clinical significance. We propose a novel adaptive cycle-consistent adversarial network (Ad Cycle GAN) to synthesize malaria significant patterns based on a homogeneous image template with randomness. The Ad Cycle GAN model consists of a pretrained convolutional variational autoencoder (CVAE) and conventional cycle-consistent adversarial network (Cycle GAN). The CVAE model is trained by a large, segmented blood cell dataset with 27,578 images. The model is optimized for 120 epochs. The CVAE is pipelined to a conventional Cycle GAN model with two generator-discriminator combinations. The real malaria positive images are at first sent to the pretrained CVAE to generate template images for the adversarial optimization with the real images. Therefore, the optimization process is to use generator G to convert the CVAE generated images from the synthetic domain (X) to the real malaria positive image domain (Y), then use generator F to convert the real malaria positive images from the real positive image domain (Y) to the CVAE synthetic image domain (X). The total generator loss is composed of adversarial loss, cycle loss, and identity loss, all loss terms are computed by least squared loss. The Ad Cycle GAN architecture is optimized by 150 epochs. When using a pretrained classifier to differentiate the real and synthetic malaria positive image, 99.61% of the real images from the real image set are accurately recognized, compared to 86.6% of the synthetic images are accurately classified. The average score of Frechet Inception Distance (FID) of the generated images by the Ad Cycle GAN is 0.0053 (Std=0.0004). By human eye observation, the Ad Cycle GAN generated images have reasonable fidelity as real blood cells with meaningful pathological patterns that properly mimics real malaria infected blood cells. The proposed Ad Cycle model can generate synthetic malaria infected blood cell images to successfully optimize the deep neural network model for high classification accuracy. We conclude that the new Ad Cycle GAN model can generate high quality malaria infected blood cell images with good diversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207