Damped Chirp Mixture Estimation Via Nonlinear Bayesian Regression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estimating mixtures of damped chirp sinusoids in noise is a problem that affects audio analysis, coding, and synthesis applications. Phase-based non-stationary parameter estimators assume that sinusoids can be resolved in the Fourier transform domain, whereas high-resolution methods estimate superimposed components with accuracy close to the theoretical limits, but only for sinusoids with constant frequencies. We present a new method for estimating the parameters of superimposed damped chirps that has an accuracy competitive with existing non-stationary estimators but also has a high-resolution like subspace techniques. After providing the analytical expression for a Gaussian-windowed damped chirp signal's Fourier transform, we propose an efficient variational EM algorithm for nonlinear Bayesian regression that jointly estimates the amplitudes, phases, frequencies, chirp rates, and decay rates of multiple non-stationary components that may be obfuscated under the same local maximum in the frequency spectrum. Quantitative results show that the new method not only has an estimation accuracy that is close to the Cramér-Rao bound, but also a high resolution that outperforms the state-of-the-art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".