Electrochemical, Photophysical, Morphological and DFT Study of Polymorphic Sn(IV)‐Porphyrins Containing Fluorinated Axial Ligand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
], where A is the axial ligand=3,5-difluoro phenol, compound 1). One form stabilizes in triclinic system (namely, 1α), and the other stabilizes in monoclinic system (namely, 1β). The two 1α and 1β polymorphs display distinct photophysical and morphological properties in the solid state. X-ray diffraction study reveals that these polymorphs 1α and 1β significantly differ in their supramolecular architecture, different axial phenolate conformations, and noncovalent interactions, which are responsible for their distinct solid-state properties. The crystal packing of these polymorphs dominates by intermolecular C-H⋅⋅⋅F, C-H⋅⋅⋅π and C-Br⋅⋅⋅F interhalogen interactions. Furthermore, the solid-state emission spectra of 1α showed red-shifted emission bands with respect to 1β, in addition the redox behavior of 1α is slightly different in comparison to 1β. Complementary theoretical studies with Hirshfeld surface analysis show the definite role of Br⋅⋅⋅F interhalogen interactions in the overall stability. Mapping the electrostatic potential isosurfaces with the aid of density functional theory in compound 1 clearly shows the presence of σ-hole, a requisite feature to show halogen interactions in the crystalline state. In addition, lattice energy and single point energy calculation shows that 1α was found to be energetically more favorable and thermodynamically more stable compare to 1β.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".