MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285391138 · doi:10.1017/s0269964822000195

Applications of the classical compound Poisson model with claim sizes following a compound distribution

2022· article· en· W4285391138 on OpenAlex
Dechen Gao, Kristina P. Sendova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProbability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNegative binomial distributionPoisson distributionZero-inflated modelZero (linguistics)GeneralizationGeometric distributionBinomial distributionApplied mathematicsBinomial (polynomial)Compound Poisson distributionMathematicsDistribution (mathematics)Count dataPoisson binomial distributionRisk modelComputer scienceStatistical physicsProbability distributionPoisson regressionStatisticsBeta-binomial distributionMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we discuss a generalization of the classical compound Poisson model with claim sizes following a compound distribution. As applications, we consider models involving zero-truncated geometric, zero-truncated negative-binomial and zero-truncated binomial batch-claim arrivals. We also provide some ruin-related quantities under the resulting risk models. Finally, through numerical examples, we visualize the behavior of these quantities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it