MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285391220 · doi:10.2196/39745

Correction: The Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery (HIPPER) as an eHealth Approach to Presurgical Hip Replacement Education: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2022· erratum· en· W4285391220 on OpenAlexaffvenue
William C. Miller, Somayyeh Mohammadi, Wendy Watson, Morag Crocker, Marie Westby

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrehabilitationeHealthProtocol (science)Randomized controlled trialMedicinePhysical therapyMedical physicsAlternative medicineSurgeryHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In "The Hip Instructional Prehabilitation Program for Enhanced Recovery (HIPPER) as an eHealth Approach to Presurgical Hip Replacement Education: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial" (JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(7):e29322) the authors noted the following errors:The fourth timepoint (T4) was not recorded as a part of the study and was inadvertently included in the paper.As a result, the following 17 corrections have been made: XSL • FO RenderXThis is a non-peer-reviewed article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.304
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.304
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1280.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes→French-language works237,207→