Introduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'effort « compensatoire » (Rennes 2016 : 10) fourni par les chercheureuses depuis les années 1970 en études de genre a permis de mieux connaitre les œuvres de femmes ou de certaines contre-cultures minoritaires : il est aujourd'hui relativement aisé de trouver des bibliographies fourmillantes d'informations sur les œuvres de telle ou telle période, sur la vie de telle ou tel artiste.Une certaine lassitude s'installe alors, au fil des titres paresseux d'articles, de livres, d'expositions, qui relaient sans cesse le même poncif : « où sont les femmes ?», « oubliées de l'histoire », « invisibilisées », etc. Ce ressassement nous inquiète.Dès l'essor des études de genre, notamment aux États-Unis, depuis les années 1970-1980, jusqu'aux études contemporaines (soutenues publiquement ou s'élaborant aux marges des instances légitimantes du savoir et
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.424 | 0.212 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".