MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285397944 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-01381715mtgabs

Reduction of Interfacial Gaps and Enhancement of PEM Fuel Cell Performance Via a New CCL|MPL Architecture

2022· article· en· W4285397944 on OpenAlexaff
Arman Bonakdarpour, Lius Daniel, David P. Wilkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon blackMaterials scienceProton exchange membrane fuel cellMembrane electrode assemblyPorosityCathodeChemical engineeringLayer (electronics)ElectrodeCatalysisMembraneComposite materialNanotechnologyFuel cellsChemistryAnodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new enhanced architecture for fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) which incorporates deposition of an MPL layer directly on a catalyst coated membrane (CCM) is demonstrated. This modified MPL helps to reduce interfacial gaps present between the catalyst layer and the conventional MPL-coated gas diffusion layer of the MEAs and reduces water accumulation, which ultimately results in higher power densities (Figure 1). Three types of commercial carbon black with different porosity and hydrophilicity were directly deposited on the low loading cathode catalyst layers (0.1 mgPt cm−2) of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) used in H2/O2 fuel cells. Among the carbon materials investigated, Acetylene Black- and Vulcan XC72R-based modified MPLs (mass loadings ~ 0 – 1.0 mg cm−2) lead to higher performance in the high current density regions due to their lower porosity and higher hydrophobicity. Detailed information about this approach, preparation and performance characteristics will be discussed during the meeting. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→