Out-of-Plane Polarized Visible Luminescence and Electronic Resonance in Black Phosphorus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After reports of high mobility and a tunable bandgap covering a wide spectral range from the visible to the mid-infrared region, layered black phosphorus (BP) has emerged as a promising 2D material for high performance electronic and optoelectronic devices. Owing to its orthorhombic crystallographic structure, black phosphorus expresses strong anisotropic properties. While recent investigations on few-layers crystals have extensively explored the in-plane anisotropy, much less attention has been given to the out-of-plane direction. In this work, we use polarization-resolved photoluminescence (PL) and Raman spectroscopies to investigate the band structure anisotropy of bulk BP along the in-plane (zigzag, armchair) and out-of-plane directions. An unexpected room-temperature luminescence is detected in the visible, and strongly polarized in the out-of-plane direction. This emission, detected at 1.75 eV far above the band gap (0.3 eV), is surprising as it violates Kasha's rule which favors light emission from the lowest energy states. To elucidate its origin, we have systematically examined the characteristics of this luminescence as a function of polarization, temperature and excitation energy. These results reveal an unreported out-of-plane resonance at 2.3 eV in both the PL and Raman responses. Polarization selection rules and density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the complex dielectric permittivity are used to understand the origin of the strongly polarized optical response and demonstrate the remarkable extent to which the anisotropy influences the optical properties and carrier dynamics in black phosphorus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".