MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285398180 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-0162485mtgabs

(Digital Presentation) Thermal Runaway Initiation, Propagation and the Potential for Propagation Inhibition in Commercial Automotive Lithium-Ion Cells and Modules

2022· article· en· W4285398180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andreas Podias, Ákos Kriston, Andreas Pfrang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal runawayExothermic reactionFlammable liquidBattery (electricity)Lithium (medication)Nuclear engineeringMaterials sciencePower (physics)Automotive engineeringChemistryEnvironmental scienceForensic engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringWaste managementPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium-ion batteries, containing flammable electrolytes, have become safer in many ways since their invention. As the technology matures, energy and power densities increase: the European Council for Automotive R&D set 2030 (cell level) targets for battery electric vehicle energy density of 1000 Wh L-1, with 450 Wh kg-1 specific energy and 1800 W kg-1 peak specific power. This rise in energy and power densities increases the risk of accidental release of energy from the batteries and thermal runaway (TR). Safety is thus a key concern when designing a lithium-ion battery system for electric vehicles (EV). TR relates to fast heating of a battery cell caused by exothermic chemical decomposition reactions of the materials inside the cells. It develops in a cell when heat is generated and cannot be dissipated quickly enough to the surroundings, giving rise to an abrupt (exponential) temperature increase and subsequent reaction rate increase. During TR, various exothermic side reactions can occur, leading to temperature increase, accompanied by pressure increase as electrolyte evaporates and venting. This can result in the emission of highly flammable gas and the formation of toxic atmosphere, as well as, in fire and, in very rare circumstances, in explosion. The corresponding temperature increase in adjacent cells (or modules) might then be sufficient to cause them to also go into TR – leading to a process known as thermal runaway propagation (TRP). Fit-for purpose testing procedures to assess the risks associated with TRP are therefore of utmost importance and the focus should always be the safety of the EV occupants, bystanders, first responders and property. Some tests in current standards and regulations try to simulate internally driven failures (e.g. internal short circuit), but whether these tests are suitable to represent field failures remains an open question. This work will give an insight into two selected TR initiation methods assessed within JRC’s TR initiation and propagation test campaigns, namely (a) localised rapid external heating, as developed and patented internationally by NRC (National Research Council Canada) and (b) ceramic nail penetration, as described in the IEC TR 62660-4 standard. It examines the response of short-stacks of pouch cells extracted from automotive batteries after TR is triggered in a single cell. Experimental data and analysis to better understand how TR propagates and the potential for TRP inhibition will be reported. The potential of inhibiting TRP is explored on 2- and 5-cell assemblies with a multi-layer, porous, composite insulation material between cells. Separating the cells can delay significantly TRP in adjacent cells in modules constructed with pouch cells, whereas TRP may be slowed and even inhibited as the thickness of the multilayer material varies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2540.082

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207