Electrotuneable Radical Polymers for Thin-Film Electronic Device Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyradicals – organic radical polymers in which each repeating unit contains a singly occupied molecular orbital (i.e. an unpaired electron spin) – are unique alternatives to their π-conjugated and semiconducting counterparts for several applications.[1] Unique of polyradicals are tunable charge states at their repeating units (see figure) which enable multi-stable charge transport regimes at the nanoscale. In this talk, we will present the use of thin films of polyradicals in transparent and flexible thin-film nanoelectronics. Although field-effect thin-film transistors (FETs) and flash memory devices ("memristors") based on radical polymers have been often proposed, memristor stability was frequently limited to a few writing cycles, in spite of the excellent quality of the active layer, and no FETs have been demonstrated, even though evidence of polyradical doping has been offered.[2] Here, the design criteria for flash memory devices are reviewed.It will be shown, using a combination of Kelvin-probe force microscopy (KPFM), electrical transport and optical measurements, that single-layer flash memory devices can be demonstrated from 6-oxoverdazyls, a class of radical polymers from which ultra-thin and ultra-smooth organic thin flims are advantageously processable.[3] As a case study, ultrathin devices in which the active layer is formed by a 15-nm homogeneous film of a poly-norbornene-6-oxoverdazyl (PN-6OV) polyradical synthesized by a dry vacuum polymer deposition technique are presented and compared with the corresponding devices of poly-6-oxoverdazyls (P6OV) synthesized by wet chemistry. [4] We will show that high performance is associated to the presence three tunable charge states in each monomer: positive, neutral, and negative, and also depends on the length of the pendant groups to which the radical repeating units are attached. We will demonstrate that careful engineering of the anode and cathode work functions, specifically aligning them with the negative and positive energy levels of the polyradical, is vital to maximize the on/off current ratio and ensure flash operation. The possibility to achieve electro-tunable poly-6-oxoverdazyl radical polymers by different techniques offer uniques opportunities for their use in a variety of different contexts, for example in transparent and/or flexible electronics, and where compatibility with different substrates is required. In the last part of our talk, we will present how a vertical device architecture, with drain-source contacts sandwiching the active layer of a strongly correlated 6-oxoverdazyl polyradical, leads to on/off ratios >103 in p-type PR-FETs. [4] Hole injection thus occurs by contact doping via tunable charge states at the polyradical-electrode interface. PRFETs are superior to existing organic FETs as they combine memristor and transistor functions in one mem-transistor device, offering unique potential for synaptic and spintronic applications. [1] Joo, Y.; Agarkar, V.; Sung, S. H.; Savoie, B. M.; Boudouris, B. W. A Nonconjugated Radical Polymer Glass with High Electrical Conductivity. Science 2018, 359, 1391-1395 [2] Nguyen, T. P.; Easley, A. D.; Kang, N.; Khan, S.; Lim,S-M.; Rezenom, Y. H.; Wang, S.; Tran, D. K.; Fan, J.; Letteri, R. A.; He, X.; Su, L.; Yu, C-H.; Lutkenhaus, J. L.; Wooley K, L. Polypeptide organic radical batteries. Nature, 2021, 593, 61 [3] Ezugwu, S.; Paquette, J. A.; Yadav, V.; Gilroy, J. B.; Fanchini, G. Design Criteria for Ultrathin Single-Layer Flash Memristors from an Organic Polyradical. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1600253 [4] Singh, D.; Magnan, F.; Gilroy, J. B.; Fanchini, G. Transparent and flexible field-effect transistors and mem-transistors with electroactive layers of solution-processed organic polyradicals, https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10212 Figure 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".