MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285399137 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-01431874mtgabs

Electrochemical Characterization of Auranofin in Aqueous Media

2022· article· en· W4285399137 on OpenAlexaff
Melak Yosseif, Vikram Singh, Dustin Maydaniuk, Silvia T. Cardona, Sabine Kuss

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuranofinElectrochemistryAqueous solutionChemistryNuclear chemistryElectrodeOrganic chemistryMedicinePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detection of antibiotic compounds in various media is necessary in solving the public health crisis of antibiotic resistance[1]. Auranofin (AF) is a repurposed antibiotic first used as an antirheumatic in the 1950s. It is useful against various bacteria, fungi, virus infections and cancers either by itself or synergistically with other antibiotics[2–5]. AF is composed of aurothioglucose and phosphine moieties, and therefore, has lipophilic and hydrophilic properties, making its characterization in aqueous media particularly difficult. In the presented study, electrochemistry was employed to characterize and detect AF in aqueous solutions using modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs), coated with Carbon Black (CB). CB coating was optimized, oxidation and reduction potentials were identified, and pH dependence, as well as Limits of Detection (LOD) and Quantification (LOQ) were determined. Interferences with ions and other antibiotics was studies and are important factors for the detection of AF in the environment. This study reports on the sensitivity, stability, and selectivity of the CB-GCE sensors, proving useful for future field detection and/or bioelectrochemical investigations. CITATIONS [1] M.R. Islam, S. Kuss, F. Schweizer, Characterization of Antibiotic Compounds By Electrochemistry, ECS Meeting Abstracts. MA2020-01 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2020-01442531mtgabs. [2] R. Díez-Martínez, E. García-Fernández, M. Manzano, Á. Martínez, M. Domenech, M. Vallet-Regí, P. García, Auranofin-loaded nanoparticles as a new therapeutic tool to fight streptococcal infections, Scientific Reports. 6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19525. [3] K.J. Habermann, L. Grünewald, S. van Wijk, S. Fulda, Targeting redox homeostasis in rhabdomyosarcoma cells: GSH-depleting agents enhance auranofin-induced cell death, Cell Death & Disease. 8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2017.412. [4] E. v. Capparelli, R. Bricker-Ford, M.J. Rogers, J.H. McKerrow, S.L. Reed, Phase I clinical trial results of auranofin, a novel antiparasitic agent, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01947-16. [5] T. Onodera, I. Momose, M. Kawada, Potential anticancer activity of auranofin, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c18-00767.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207