MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285399502 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-01451920mtgabs

Two Routes for Sonochemical Synthesis of Pt-Nanoparticles

2022· article· en· W4285399502 on OpenAlexaff
Henrik Erring Hansen, Frode Seland, Svein Sunde, Odne Stokke Burheim, Bruno G. Pollet

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicUltrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleationSodium borohydrideSonochemistryNanoparticleMaterials scienceSonicationDispersityCatalysisReducing agentChemical engineeringNanotechnologyParticle sizeParticle (ecology)Chemical reductionElectrochemistryChemistryElectrodeOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve the performance of electrochemical hydrogen conversion devices such as electrolyzers and fuel cells, more efficient catalyst materials must be developed. As the available surface area is key to the performance of a catalyst, high surface area nanoparticles are required. The synthesis of such nanostructured catalysts is predominantly based on chemical reduction with a strong reducing agent like sodium borohydride. However, it is difficult to achieve the desired particle properties without the use of additives such as surfactants or stabilizers. In order to achieve more control over the nucleation and growth stage of the nanoparticles, we can replace the chemical reduction route by sonochemical reduction. In sonochemistry, high power ultrasound is used to generate reducing radicals which allow for controlled reduction of metal precursors. The radical generation rate is strongly linked to the nucleation and growth of the resulting nanoparticles and can easily be tuned by adjusting the ultrasonic frequency and power. Ultrasound therefore offers an easy and reproducible way of tuning the size of nanoparticles. In our work we have compared the size, shape, and morphology of Pt-nanoparticles synthesized sonochemically and with chemical reduction to see if the sonochemical route indeed offers better control during nucleation and growth. TEM-images along with X-ray diffractograms revealed that the sonochemical route gives smaller and more monodisperse particles compared to chemical reduction. In addition, the particle shape was found to be spherical with the sonochemical route, whereas chemical reduction resulted in many different shapes. The better and easier control over synthesis parameters exhibited by the sonochemical route can therefore be utilized to produce nanoparticles of very similar physical properties. We also showed that the catalytic properties of these nanoparticles towards hydrogen evolution were very similar further strengthening the sonochemical route when it comes to development of catalyst materials. A comparison between high frequency (408 kHz) and low frequency (20 kHz) ultrasound was also made to determine the impact of the higher mechanical effects expected at lower frequencies. No significant differences in particle size and morphology were found, but agglomerate sizes were found to decrease at lower frequencies. In addition, it was found that extensive probe erosion occurs at 20 kHz resulting in contamination of the nanoparticle solution. In fact, it was shown that the eroded particles act as nucleation sites for Pt-nanoparticles and increased reduction rates were observed. No such particle erosion happened at higher frequencies which led us to conclude that direct sonication at low ultrasonic frequencies in general must be avoided to prevent contamination of your system. This is important in all applications of low frequency (20 kHz) ultrasound, whether it be sonochemistry, dispersion of colloids, or ink preparation for electrochemical characterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207