MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285399788 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-014514mtgabs

2D Ultrathin NiCo<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub> Nanosheets-Assisted 3D Highly Stable Lithium Metal Anode

2022· article· en· W4285399788 on OpenAlexaff
Xuzi Zhang, Ge Li

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeMaterials scienceCathodeLithium (medication)Current densityChemical engineeringCarbon fibersCarbon nanofiberPorosityMetalLithium metalComposite numberNanotechnologyComposite materialElectrodeMetallurgyCarbon nanotubeChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium (Li) metal is usually considered one of the most promising anode candidates for next-generation batteries owing to its extremely high specific capacity and low reduction potential. However, the application of Li metal anode is still hindered by the uncontrolled growth of dendritic Li and extreme volume fluctuation during cycles. Herein, we demonstrate a flexible and self-supporting 3D interlaced carbon nanofibers coated with 2D ultrathin NiCo2S4 nanosheets (denoted as CNF@NiCo2S4) which are containing high lithiophilicity and porous structure. This unique structure can significantly reduce the exchange current density and improve the performance for plating Li. Moreover, metallic Li can be further confined within the interspace among the CNF and inside the porous carbon nanoboxes significantly avoiding dendritic Li formation. The CNF@NiCo2S4 composite anode exhibits a long-running lifespan for 1000h with an exceptionally low voltage hysteresis. Full cells with LiFePO4 cathode and LiǀCNF@NiCo2S4 anode show typical voltage profiles but enhanced cycle performance than that of LiFePO4 coupling with bare Li anode at low N/P ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→