MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285399979 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-012337mtgabs

Synthesizing Microporous Carbon from Soybean and Use It to Develop Cathode Material for High Performance Lithium-Selenium Batteries

2022· article· en· W4285399979 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Hosein Ahmadian Hoseini, Mohammad Hossein Aboonasr Shiraz, Tao Li, Mohammad Arjmand, Jian Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroporous materialMaterials scienceLithium (medication)Chemical engineeringActivated carbonCarbon fibersCathodeCarbonizationSpecific surface areaAdsorptionComposite materialChemistryComposite numberScanning electron microscopeOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selenium is considered as a promising cathode material for lithium-ion batteries due to its high electrical conductivity (10−3 S m−1) and volumetric capacity (3253 mA h cm−3). Though, feasibility of high-performance lithium-selenium (Li-Se) batteries depends on designing a cost-effective substrate for Se with desired porous structure. In this study, porous carbon was synthesized from soybean in a two-step carbonization/activation process and used as Se host to develop cathode for lithium-selenium (Li-Se) batteries. The activated carbon/selenium (C/Se) composites were prepared using a melt diffusion process at 260 ℃ inside an argon-filled autoclave. The cathode material consisted of C/Se composite, carbon black, and sodium alginate with a mass ratio of 8:1:1. The effect of activation temperature (500, 600, and 700 ℃) on the porous structure of activated carbon was investigated. It was revealed that both specific surface area and pore volume increased with activation temperature. Moreover, the carbon activated at 500 ℃ (C500) possessed mainly mesopores while the pore structure in the other carbon samples was microporous. The quality of Se impregnation in C/Se composites and their distinct electrochemical performance were correlated to the porous structure of the activated carbon. Using the carbon obtained at 600 ℃ (C600), the Li-Se coin cell exhibited a superior discharge capacity (664 mAh g-1 at 0.1C current density), rate capability, and long cycling stability at higher current densities. It was believed that the microporous feature of C600 along with high surface area and pore volume could favor effective confinement of Se, electrolyte wetting of the cathode, lithium-ion diffusion, and charge transfer, which resulted in better electrochemical performance. This work suggests the sustainable development of microporous carbon with a unique structure suitable for cathode material in Li-Se batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→