Determining the Influence of Catalyst Layer Architecture and Reactant Flow in an MEA for the Electrochemical Nitrogen Reduction Reaction Under Ambient Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ammonia (NH3) has been increasingly recognized as an advantageous energy/hydrogen carrier beyond agriculture use to assist in the achievement of net-zero and decarbonization goals. For over a century, NH3 production has been dominated by the thermochemical Haber-Bosch process which consumes significant fossil fuel-related energy and feedstocks with a heavy carbon footprint. By contrast, the electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (ENRR) presents a sustainable and modular approach to fit remote and small-scale NH3 needs, which has attracted growing interest in recent years. Rational design of electrocatalysts (e.g., introducing defects, size reduction, and heteroatom doping) has been the mainstream approach to address the bottlenecks in the ENRR, especially the low specific activity and poor faradaic efficiency. However, attempts to vary the ENRR electrolytic cell layout/design or the operating conditions have been scarce, and therefore present an opportunity to improve the NH3 electrosynthesis performance by well-thought-out reactor designs coupled with operating conditions. Our study aims to understand the influence of catalyst layer/electrode architectures and reactant mass transfer on the ENRR performance of model catalysts in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) cell under different flow configurations. On the anode side, a platinum-coated membrane is used to oxidize the humidified H2, which provides sufficient protons for the cathode reactions. On the cathode side, electrocatalysts with commercial availability and reported ENRR activities are applied as the catalyst (e.g., noble metal, transition metal nitrides or dichalcogenides). The catalyst layer is deposited on the gas-diffusion layer and/or the proton-exchange membrane to construct a gas-diffusion electrode (GDE) and/or a catalyst-coated membrane (CCM). Subsequently, the NH3 electrosynthesis performances are evaluated under different cathode flow conditions for the varied catalyst layer architectures. Initially, the N2-saturated aqueous electrolyte (Na2SO4) is recirculated on the cathode side to flood the cathode surface constantly, which resembles the operating condition in the liquid-filled H-cell present in previous ENRR studies. In these cases, the catalytic sites are predominantly covered by proton donors (e.g., hydronium ions or water molecules) without accessing N2 molecules that only dissolve marginally (0.06 mmol/L) in aqueous media. Hence, in contrast with the “liquid-only” flow configuration, humidified N2 gas is supplied alone (“gas-only”) or in combination with the recirculated electrolyte solution (“gas-liquid”) to increase the presence of N2 near catalytic sites. When gaseous N2 is present, the gas outlet pressure (cell back pressure), as well as membrane drying, were observed to affect the current density and operational stability. Additionally, false positives are diligently recognized which arise from residual N-containing species in the MEA and environmental NH3 contamination. Linear scan voltammetry, the routine electrochemical characterization to distinguish potentially ENRR-active electrocatalysts, was found to be particularly susceptible and contribute significantly to erroneous ENRR performance. In short, This work demonstrates the challenge of getting authentic ammonia production in aqueous systems with improved electrolytic cell designs and operating conditions. References: Z. Andersen, V. Čolić, S. Yang, J. A. Schwalbe, A. C. Nielander, J. M. McEnaney, K. Enemark-Rasmussen, J. G. Baker, A. R. Singh, B. A. Rohr, M. J. Statt, S. J. Blair, S. Mezzavilla, J. Kibsgaard, P. C. K. Vesborg, M. Cargnello, S. F. Bent, T. F. Jaramillo, I. E. L. Stephens, J. K. Nørskov and I. Chorkendorff, Nature, 2019, 570, 504–508. Wei, M. Pu, Y. Jin and M. Wessling, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13, 21411–21425. Figure captions: the top two figures illustrate the liquid- and gas-phase flow configurations in this study; and the bottom two figures demonstrate the negligible production of NH3 from the gas-phase reaction condition where significant amounts of erroneous NH3 production was observed from linear scan voltammetry (LSV). Figure 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".